California Rental Carpet Life Expectancy

If you re a landlord be check the carpet s warranty.

California rental carpet life expectancy.

Carpets have a life expectancy of about 10 years. Normal wear what it includes. Suppose a tenant has damaged beyond repair an 8 old carpet that had a life expectancy of ten years and that a replacement carpet of similar quality would cost 1 000. Paint may have a useful life of 2 3 years depending on who you ask.

The department of housing and urban development has created a sample chart providing the life expectancy of items in a rental unit 7 please note that the chart below is a guide only life expectancy varies. The landlord could properly charge only 200 for the two years worth of life use that would have remained if the tenant had not damaged the carpet. If you re a tenant ask to see proof of how old the carpet is and when the landlord expects to replace it. Learn more on carpet damage here.

For example carpeting has a useful life of 10 years. Even if no damage to the rental property carpet has occurred age and normal wear eventually triggers the need for replacement. However top grade carpets in high end. Useful life is defined as the life expectancy of an appliance product or item.

Rental grade carpeting usually has a useful life of five years according to diana valin cpm owner broker of the rental xperts in encinitas ca. The tenant damaged the carpeting by spilling kool aid and cooking oil throughout and in the spots where there are not stains there are cigarette burns as the tenant used the carpet as an ashtray. Depending on the age of the appliance or carpet the landlord must pro rate the cost against the average life of the appliance or carpet. For example suppose a tenant has damaged beyond repair an eight year old carpet that had a life expectancy of ten years and that a replacement carpet of similar quality would cost 1 000.

You can even ask that this information be documented in the lease. The life expectancy of carpeting in a rental unit is 10 years. Pay a portion of the total. Thus if the tenant s damage cheated three years out of the carpets life the landlord under california law could only hold the tenant responsible for 300.

Using the same example with a life expectancy of nine years and if a replacement carpet of similar quality would cost 2 000 the landlord could properly charge only 222 22 for only one years worth of life use that would have remained if the tenant had not damaged the carpet. If the carpet originally cost 1 000 and had a life expectancy of 10 years the depreciation charge would be 100 per year.